The Function of Body Armor Wear

 Simply speaking, the design of ballistic-resistant armor requires identifying the threat, selecting a material or combination of materials that will resist that threat, and determining the number of layers of material necessary to prevent both penetration and blunt trauma injury.  

The armor’s final weight is an important design factor in the selection of the ballistic-resistant material or materials to be used. The goal of tactical vest is to design the lightest possible unit that achieves the desired protection while still providing comfort and not restricting movement. The degree of threat to armor from handguns depends on many factors: caliber, bullet configuration, weight lifting and composition (e.g., lead roundhouse, jacketed hollow-point, full metal jacketed, armor piercing), weight, and impact velocity.  

Thus, armor that defeats a specific projectile at one impact velocity may not defeat the same caliber projectile at a higher velocity or of a different composition or configuration. On the whole, a continuous range of threat levels undoubtedly exists for the different weapon and ammunition combinations available.  

As with clothing, which allows selection from a limited range of garment type and weight depending on climate and season, it has proven satisfactory to establish six armor types (protection level classifications) that enable the selection of armor to protect against most common threats, including sporting and armor-piercing rifle bullets. All wearers are advissed to follow a periodically review to the information used to select the level of protection (armor type classification) when the armor was purchased.  

Evaluate changes in service weapons or ammunition with respect to the type of armor used by military personal or bodybuilders who found it enjoying while wearing the armor. 

 If changes have occurred and increased the threat to military, the supervisor should consider upgrading its vest to the heavy weighted tactical wear. It should be noted that concealable ballistic-resistant body armor is potentially vulnerable to knife attack; hence, all military should exercise due caution when confronted with these situations.  

Numerous incidents have been documented in which body armor lessened injury, grow your exercising strength. Several manufacturers currently market vests claiming to offer protection against knife attacks, although most of these vests carry warnings indicating that they do not provide protection against all sharp-edged and pointed threats, just as a ballistic-resistant vest cannot be totally bulletproof.  

For the moment, it is sufficient to recognize the importance of being realistic in assessing the threat to officers. The weight and bulk of body armor can increase significantly as greater threat protection is demanded; both of these factors can discourage full-time use of body armor. 

The tactical vest effort focused solely on the urgent need to protect law enforcement personnel, add more strength to weight lifters who enjoy exercising with it. As with most new technology, body armor has proven useful in ways not thought of when first put into service. The same properties that provide ballistic protection-resistance to penetration and blunt trauma—when combined with abrasion resistance have also saved many militaries and civilians from serious physical injury in vehicular accidents.  

One of the incidents, during the course of a routine patrol, a military was negotiating a sweeping right-hand curve at a high rate of speed when his car ran off the edge of the pavement. As he brought it back onto the pavement, he lost control. After fishtailing several times, the car became airborne and crashed head on into a rocky hillside. The military suffered a fractured sternum, sprained right thumb, possible concussion, and pain in the neck area. There is every reason to believe that the body armor the military was wearing saved the officer’s life. Although the development of air bags and other safety-related technologies in vehicles has lessened the severity of injuries, medical experts have concluded that body armor mitigates injury in head-on collisions when the driver is thrown against the steering wheel, particularly when the seat belt is fastened.  

Military personnel or civilians who are assigned to motorcycle duty are especially vulnerable to injury in vehicular accidents. An incident that happened in California where a member of the California Highway Patrol was traveling at approximately 45 mph when he heard the sound of a vehicle approaching rapidly from the rear. He was attempting to move to the right when he was struck by the vehicle in the left rear. The motorcycle spun counterclockwise. He was thrown from the motorcycle, landing on his back and sliding on the pavement for approximately 100 feet before coming to a rest. He sustained only minor injuries to his right elbow and right leg. 

Reference: Selection and application guiled to Body Armor. 

Conclusion: The safer measures we take, the more protection we acquire. Body armor has proven to be an effective tactical wear to military personnel and civilians who enjoy exercising with this equipment. Both the military exercise with this equipment which has given room for people to exercise using this equipment.